How well equipped is Liberty Hill to adapt to future change
Respondents were asked ‘Currently, how well equipped is Liberty Hill to adapt to future change, and to move quickly to create and seize new opportunities?
Key things to note:
270 valid ratings
145 respondents (53.7%) rated readiness negatively, compared with 65 (24.1%) positively. Negative ratings outnumber positive ratings by more than two to one.
The mean of −1.10 is the lowest across the ten rating questions. Confidence in the community’s capacity to respond to change is a central strategic weakness.
95 respondents (35.2%) rated readiness −3 to −5. The Strategic Action Plan needs address how to build capacity to adapt.
Sentiment: The ratings convey limited confidence in readiness for change. Related comments question whether infrastructure, planning, and organizational capacity can keep pace.
Key theme: Confidence is likely to depend on visible execution: clear priorities, realistic timelines, consistent decisions, and evidence of completed work.
There was a good spread of responses and the chart can be filtered according to age group, ethnicity and residency on the right hand side.
